> > Now [EMAIL PROTECTED] people are maitaining the manual
> > notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not
> > too many people there....
>
> I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quickly
> these days. Usually minutes after a "bad" new note is posted, someone
> rejects/deletes it (usually Zak).
>
> There are a lot of notes out there that have lived within the manual for
> years, some of which are outdated and inappropriate. A coordinated effort
> of gurus to review each manual page and mark it as "approved" would be
> nice, and let the current team review new/old notes as done currently.
> We'd be caught up.
>
> I agree allowing the public to manage notes would work pretty well but for
> the record, I don't feel the "problem" sits with unmoderated new notes but
> rather, the old ones ... Spreading the love would help this too though,
> right?
Yes, that is the idea. I ended up having to unsubcribe from the php-notes
list in order to try to cut down on my mail volume. But if I could only
get a partial set of note notices by signing up to only receive notes for
certain chapters that interest me, or individual manual pages it would be
much less of a burden and I would be able to contribute at least a little
bit again. And I think many others could be convinced to do the same.
And we aren't really talking about letting "the public" do this. Simply
people with CVS accounts for now.
-Rasmus
