On Friday, July 27, 2001, at 05:16 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>> Now [EMAIL PROTECTED] people are maitaining the manual
>> notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not
>> too many people there....
> I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quickly
> these days. Usually minutes after a "bad" new note is posted, someone
> rejects/deletes it (usually Zak).
Depends on who's awake. Some folks just moderate based on their
local clock... and they only take on new ones. Others work on
specific pages, until the page is clean of notes.
> There are a lot of notes out there that have lived within the
> manual for
> years, some of which are outdated and inappropriate. A
> coordinated effort
> of gurus to review each manual page and mark it as "approved" would be
> nice, and let the current team review new/old notes as done currently.
> We'd be caught up.
Ctaching up would be nice. :-) But even a flock of guru's might
not add the errata back in...
> I agree allowing the public to manage notes would work pretty
> well but for
> the record, I don't feel the "problem" sits with unmoderated
> new notes but
> rather, the old ones ... Spreading the love would help this
> too though,
> right?
We need more love, and more spreading. We need more doc folks.
-Bop
--2D426F70|759328624|00101101010000100110111101110000
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 520-326-6109, http://www.opus1.com/ron/
The opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily those
of myself,
my employers, or any of the other little voices in my head.
