on 6/08/01 21:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
> Is that needed for translations?
This won't hurt, and this helps me keep track of files, since version is
also written on them.
> The reason I added them to 'en', was because translations are relative to a
> en-revision. For translations, that is not true. IMO, it is best if there is
> a En-Revision: 1.XX comment, which is manually updated and reflects the
> revision of the _english_ version, the translation is up-to-date to.
Is there anything set up to associate translation current version with
en revision version? I keep up as much as I can, but it might be
useful for less updated translation to bear those information.
How is this going to be processed?
Best regards,
Damien Seguy
