>> The reason I added them to 'en', was because translations
>are relative to a
>> en-revision. For translations, that is not true. IMO, it is
>best if there is
>> a En-Revision: 1.XX comment, which is manually updated and
>reflects the
>> revision of the _english_ version, the translation is up-to-date to.
>Is there anything set up to associate translation current version with
>en revision version? I keep up as much as I can, but it might be
>useful for less updated translation to bear those information.
>
>How is this going to be processed?
Just like the Translators files. By your eyes :))
There wont be no automation (at least in the near
future), to detect translations updateness with the $Revision
tag in the en tree, and <!-- En-revision ... --> comment in
the translated trees.
Goba
