I don't think a license issue exists, the real issue is whether or not the zend docs are up-to-date. Last time we discussed this, they were not. Basically, afaik, they need to be rewritten but I'm not a php-devel guy so can't say much for sure. Basically, someone with good knowledge of creating PHP extensions needs to be in charge, anyone? :)
Regards, Philip Olson On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Sch�fbeck wrote: > > Very nice idea ;) As I tried to propagte the idea of having a separate > > <book> (!) for developing PHP, and providing it in a separate download, > > I fully agree on at least consolidating these sections all in one place > > in the manual. BTW I still think it would be better to open a new book > > on developing PHP, because this part is **rarely** used by PHP > > programmers. It would make searches faster, download size smaller, > > manual generation faster + simpler, etc. > > > > hmm.. must have missed your try to propagate, but anyhow: A great idea! > > The licensing-question for the Zend-Part still stays (if we can really > do what we want), but with books we have also some other decision-points > (have to leave urgently, so it might be very incomplete): > > Integration into the phpdoc-path? > Build-handling: "semi-integrated" like the howto? > Should it be provided at www.php.net > only as a compressed file? > etc. > > Maybe we can get a detailed aim to write at least into the todo? > > Cu, > Thomas > >
