On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:30, Brandon Savage<bran...@brandonsavage.net> wrote:
> I spent a bit going over the wording with someone else before I submitted
> it. According to what I understand, it creates a stack, but doesn't behave
> in the way a stack does (last in first out). Effectively it's a queue but I
> believe it places the functions on the stack, so I'm not really sure. I do
> know it goes through then in a first-in, first-out sort of fashion.
>
> I don't see the WS you're referring to.


Me neither.

Are you planning on contributing more docs, or do you want someone to
commit this for you?

I was told on IRC that my replies looked "brutal", which was totally
not the intention.
I thought you were posting so small patch just to get hang of these
things and looking for all possible feedback to "get it right" before
looking at bigger tasks..

I could easily have adjusted your initial patch myself and committed
it right away if you had no interest in contributing more and didn't
want to learn how to do it better.

-Hannes

Reply via email to