On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2009/7/28 Brandon Savage <bran...@brandonsavage.net>: > > > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:30, Brandon Savage<bran...@brandonsavage.net > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I spent a bit going over the wording with someone else before I > submitted > >>> it. According to what I understand, it creates a stack, but doesn't > >>> behave > >>> in the way a stack does (last in first out). Effectively it's a queue > but > >>> I > >>> believe it places the functions on the stack, so I'm not really sure. I > >>> do > >>> know it goes through then in a first-in, first-out sort of fashion. > >>> > >>> I don't see the WS you're referring to. > >> > >> > >> Me neither. > >> > > I can see a single space between <function> and spl_autoload_register > on line 10 of the latest patch in this thread (dated 27 July 2009 > 12:48 for me), it is that to which I was referring. Like you, I've no > idea if whitespace within tags like <function> is significant or not. > > >> Are you planning on contributing more docs, or do you want someone to > >> commit this for you? > >> > >> I was told on IRC that my replies looked "brutal", which was totally > >> not the intention. > >> I thought you were posting so small patch just to get hang of these > >> things and looking for all possible feedback to "get it right" before > >> looking at bigger tasks.. > >> > >> I could easily have adjusted your initial patch myself and committed > >> it right away if you had no interest in contributing more and didn't > >> want to learn how to do it better. > >> > >> -Hannes > > > > I've been on the list a while, but I was asked to modify the docs in this > > case. It's fairly straight forward so I will probably edit them as an > > ongoing process, and learning how it's done. > > > Has this been committed? What needs to happen before it can be committed?
