Hi Simon, thanks for the response. I noticed that the latest changes to make bindings completely pluggable have effectively made the rename of rest.rpc to restrpc. I finished things off with a few minor updates and checked these into BUZZARD.
The # is what we use when printing the model from an xml das. The example below shows the built-in SDO types. I'm not sure whether there was any precedence which led to the das choice. 1. commonj.sdo#BigDecimal 2. commonj.sdo#BigInteger 3. commonj.sdo#Boolean 4. commonj.sdo#Byte 5. commonj.sdo#Bytes 6. commonj.sdo#ChangeSummary 7. commonj.sdo#Character 8. commonj.sdo#DataObject 9. commonj.sdo#Date 10. commonj.sdo#Double 11. commonj.sdo#Float 12. commonj.sdo#Integer 13. commonj.sdo#Long 14. commonj.sdo#OpenDataObject 15. commonj.sdo#Short 16. commonj.sdo#String 17. commonj.sdo#URI On 22 Mar, 19:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Graham > > Comments in line... > > On 22 Mar, 13:05, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > During the creating of some samples for PHP Quebec, I noticed a few > > minor niggles I think we could improve.: > > > 1. @binding.ws - 'ws' is not particularly meaningful. I think we're > > unlikely to support anything other than soap with this binding, so > > +1 I would say the justification is simply that ws is soap for us and > if we want other forms of ws we will call them something else> think > @binding.soap would be much better. > > 2. @binding.rest.rpc - we have @binding.jsonrpc and @binding.xmlrpc. > > I think we should change this one to @binding.restrpc for consistency. > > +1 it makes the directory structure more sensible also> 3. Complex types > declarations - we currently require developers to > > specify @param <type_name> <namespaceURI> <Description> . This is a > > bit of an abuse of phpDocumentor and slighly breaks the documentation > > generation. It is also a little difficult to read (I always expect > > them to be the other way round, but the type name is first for > > phpDocumentor.). I would like to propose we change this to @param > > <namespaceURI>#<type_name> <Description>. > > +1 works for me but how did you choose #? Is this from some namespace > convention somewhere or is it a PHP thing?> I wanted to discuss these here > because if we make the changes, then > > people's code will break. Thoughts? > > > Regards, Graham. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
