On 3/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 29 Mar, 17:30, "Charlie Moad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28 Mar, 20:59, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just started using SDO_XML and it is proving extremely useful. > > > > I just wanted to ask a quick question that someone might know. I have > > > > several schemas that use qualified elements, so I have to put a prefix > > > > on the element names. Is there anyway I can force the saved xml to > > > > have a prefix on the default namespace? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Charlie > > > > > Hi Charlie, I don't have a difinitive answer for you but looking at > > > the code it looks like this is the way that libxml2 does things so you > > > may be stuck with it for the time being. This is the line from > > > SDOXMLWriter.cpp that writes out the root element: > > > > > rc = xmlTextWriterStartElementNS(writer, NULL, elementName, > > > elementURI); > > > > > So it looks like its down to how libxml2 handles the elementName and > > > namespace URI. There may be a way of changing this so I'm hoping one > > > of the SDO experts will jump in if that is the case. > > > > > I have found the qualification (or not) of elements to be a bit of a > > > minefield. Can I just check that when you say "force the saved xml to > > > have a prefix on the default namespace?" I assume you are talking > > > about having: > > > > > <tns:SomeElement xmlns:tn="my namespace"/> > > > > > as opposed to > > > > > <SomeElement xmlns="mynamesapce"/> > > > > > At the root element level. Is that right? > > > > That's the gist of it. I should clarify that the validation problems > > really only pop up when I am required to use qualified attributes. I > > think a way to address this would be to have a function to bridge to > > DOM. DOM allows you to control prefixes. How hard would it be to add > > a new function: > > > > DOMDocument SDO_DAS_XML::saveDOM(SDO_XMLDocument $xdoc) > > > > Just writing to a string and file can be somewhat limiting. > > > > Thanks, > > Charlie > > That's an interesting idea. Would we need to go the other way as well? > Do you know much about the PHP DOM implementation?
I started suggesting the two-way bridge, but I think it would require a lot more work to make a DOM-to-SDOXML function. It would have to make sure the document is a valid schema or schema instance. I only know the DOM api is a cover of libxml. I have not looked at the c-api. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---