On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:23 +0000, Caroline Maynard wrote:

> Alive, just sleeping ...

Sleep, whats that? Coffee.... ;)

> It's sad but true that different programs don't have the same criteria 
> for deciding what is valid WSDL. If you look back in the mailing list or 
> in our bugs list, you'll see there have been a couple of issues about 
> the .NET tools being quite picky compared to Tuscany (the Apache library 
> that we use to implement this stuff). It's only with real examples like 
> yours that we can home in  on the discrepancies, so thanks for sending 
> them. We'll take a look and see what can be done.

Agreed, absolutely! I have only just started out on this stuff, and it
seems really promising. I am going to try and expose a whole whack of
things from our framework being used to deliver e-learning in 16 African
countries in this method, so I will try and keep you all up to date as

For some background on our project, please check out

Will check in later again, I just have to try and figure out a decent
way of generating XSD for complexTypes generically...

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

All Email originating from UWC is covered by disclaimer 

Reply via email to