On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:11:01PM +0700, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > Sounds clever, but very complicated maybe to maintain the scheduling?
As already discussed, 'task' looks all right for that job. It is more powerful than it might appear at the first sight. It can handle an arbitrary number of input- and timer-events, and maintains its own environment (in dynamically bound symbols). Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]