Hi Alex, > It is a complete rewrite. Even the implementation language changed. > Instead of C it is written in a generic assembler (which in turn is > written in PicoLisp :) that generates GNU assembler code (currently > there is only a x86-64 generator, but other CPUs are possible).
I guess that miniPicoLisp is not 64 bit incarnation of future picoLisp-3 then? What are the reasons for a) complete rewrite and b) switching from C to asm? Cheers, Tomas -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
