Hi Alex, > The two implementations have almost nothing in common. Just that > 'mini' compiles also on 64 bits, because its model is independent of > the machine's word size.
so what is the reason for optimizing picolisp for 32/64 bits specificly? Is miniPicoLisp so inefficient? Or what features of picoLisp cannot be implemented in miniPicoLisp? Cheers, Tomas -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
