Hi Alex,

> The two implementations have almost nothing in common. Just that
> 'mini' compiles also on 64 bits, because its model is independent of
> the machine's word size.

so what is the reason for optimizing picolisp for 32/64 bits
specificly?  Is miniPicoLisp so inefficient?  Or what features of
picoLisp cannot be implemented in miniPicoLisp?

Cheers,

Tomas
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to