Hi Edwin, > what's the license of the documentation that comes with picoLisp?
I assumed that it is also under the GPL until now, as the GPL is the only license included in the distribution. As we are currently discussing the license issue, what would be your proposal for the documentation? Is a separate license preferable? I think the documentation is tightly coupled and in sync with the code, so I felt that it should be under the same license as the code. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
