Hi Amit, > first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I > am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get
Great! > Is there any plan to add more CPUs or just do it in plain C for 64 > bits in future (C is strictly no-no)? If no plans to add more CPUs > right now, the changes that would be needed would be substantial, say > for sparc64, mips64? I haven't touched assembly (8051 assembly only) > in 15 years so this is just idle curiosity! Since 3.0.7 there is also a PowerPC-64 version. I'm planning to tackle Sparc9 next, but didn't find the time yet. Sparc9 has a very similar structure to Ppc64. Some (most?) architectures support both 32-bit and 64-bit executables. In such cases, the 32-bit version of PicoLisp can be used for the time being (though it is more limited in its capabilities compared to the 64-bit version). Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
