On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Jakob,
> 
> > As seen here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
> 
> ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and

If you defined "threads" less strict, such that processes could be "threads",
could it make sense then?


//Jakob

-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to