On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:29:21PM +0200, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > So, as a conclusion, external objects (entities) are not as dynamically > extendable as normal objects because of the need to keep the DB intact.
True. > If I want (at runtime) other or more relations than defined for the > original (entity) class, I have to extend the class first (at runtime), > giving the necessary info as new relation definitions, and then create > an object with put> or new! for this extended class - right? Yes, correct. So perhaps in the first statement "not as dynamically extendable" should better be restated to "not as easily extendable", because it needs two steps instead of one, but is still dynamic. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
