On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:29:21PM +0200, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> So, as a conclusion, external objects (entities) are not as dynamically
> extendable as normal objects because of the need to keep the DB intact.

True.


> If I want (at runtime) other or more relations than defined for the
> original (entity) class, I have to extend the class first (at runtime),
> giving the necessary info as new relation definitions, and then create
> an object with put> or new! for this extended class - right?

Yes, correct.

So perhaps in the first statement "not as dynamically extendable" should
better be restated to "not as easily extendable", because it needs two
steps instead of one, but is still dynamic.

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to