Hi Geo, > would this be also applicable on pilMCU? or is this already something > considered on the current pilMCU?
I kind of expected this question ... Moving Lisp code into read-only memory should be possible in all PicoLisp's (except, perhaps, Ersatz). Not completely trivial - the preprocessor has to be rewritten for that because the symbol name formats differ. But I feel that it doesn't make sense except for miniPicoLisp. By doing so, you save a few hundred kilobytes in RAM at most, but get the disadvantages of a less flexible runtime environment. I do not see significant advantages for pilMCU. So I have no plan at the moment to do that. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe