I just want to report that my use of “docker run -v” was not correct. This 
works much better:

docker run -v /Users/jkleiser/script:/opt/script -it 
progit/docker-tinycore-picolisp

I can then do things like (dir "/opt/script") or (in "/opt/script/foo.sh" 
(echo)) from inside PicoLisp.

/Jon

> On 12. Aug, 2016, at 16:40, Jon Kleiser <jon.klei...@fsat.no> wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> I have now tried your container as described at 
> https://hub.docker.com/r/progit/docker-tinycore-picolisp/, and I got PicoLisp 
> version 16.5.30 running. Does your container allow me to get access to the 
> Tinycore Linux command line?
> 
> I need to load a PicoLisp file I have on my Mac. I have tried starting your 
> container like this:
> docker run -v /Users/jkleiser/script -it progit/docker-tinycore-picolisp
> but when I from inside PicoLisp do (dir "/Users/jkleiser/script”), I just get 
> NIL, so for some reason sharing the OS X file system with your container 
> doesn’t work at the moment. Maybe the container has to be set up for the new 
> ‘osxfs’ shared file system solution? I don’t know.
> 
> If I could get at the Tinycore Linux CLI, then I could maybe get my PicoLisp 
> file by use of wget or curl (if I put the file on the net first).
> 
> /Jon
> 
> 
>> On 6. Jun, 2016, at 23:32, David Bloom <ipro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> There are several reasons why I've created PicoLisp in a container.
>> 
>> 1) The image has recently been trimmed down to 14MB.  The large image was 
>> just to get something out there and refine it shortly afterwards.
>> 2) I didn't know that there was an existing extension.  Is it the latest 
>> version?  All existing apt-get/tce-load solutions were off older versions.
>> 3) PicoLisp on windows isn't very straightforward to set up but Docker seems 
>> easier.  Perhaps it can help garner more windows attention?
>> 4) And the main reason why is to run PicoLisp apps against a distributed 
>> storage on Triton container infrastructure.  Ultimately because I think 
>> people are doing it wrong, using Python mainly for data science 
>> applications.  My friend said to show people what's the right way then.  I'd 
>> much rather use PicoLisp rather than Python for data science applications.  
>> Yes I understand that it lowers the barrier of entry for non-programmers but 
>> then companies wind up hiring programmers anyway so I'm reaching for my 
>> favorite language
>> 
>> I hope that explains things more.
>> 
>> Why download a 187MB file to "try" PicoLisp in Tinycore when you can just 
>> type: "tce-load -il picolisp" to download/install the 88KB extension ?
>> 
>> I'm sorry, I don't understand the purpose of this.
>> 
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:46 PM, David Bloom <ipro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks to your collective help I'm pleased to announce the availability of 
>> PicoLisp in a docker container!  Now anyone with docker installed can try 
>> out 64-bit PicoLisp v16.2 running on Tinycore Linux by running:
>> 
>> docker pull progit/picolisp
>> 
>> The image is 187MB which I hope to trim further but this is already hundreds 
>> of MB less than most popular images.  I'll maintain the latest version in 
>> the container.
>> 
>> Please do offer up helpful suggestions if you have any and enjoy!
>> 
>> -David Bloom
>> 
>> 
> 
> PԔ � &j)m����X�����zV�u�.n7��I칻�&

Reply via email to