Thank you for the quick answer, Alex.

Println is not the key, I also played around with flush and sync and tell and every word I saw in rosetta examples :-)

But no problem at all - enjoy the weekend :-)

Another approach was to have all different senders and the one receiver in one picolisp script, communicating via a list of lists but there I got stuck with forking the processes. Perhaps I come up with that question here, but first have to find the failing sources.

Kind regards,


On 04.02.2017 15:42, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Olaf,

just a wild guess, I'm too lazy ATM to try:

== hey.l ==
(out "listener" (print 'tput "clear"))
(out "listener" (print 'tput "cup" 3 15))
(out "listener" (print 'echo "hey"))
Should it not be 'println' instead of 'print', so that the shell gets a newline

♪♫ Alex


Reply via email to