What does setf do that set or setq can't do? On June 27, 2019 4:51:13 AM UTC, Bruno Franco <brunofrancosala...@gmail.com> wrote: >Soo, yeah. I'm studying common lisp, and coming from picolisp setf >confused >me at first. The concept does not seem to appear on picolisp, and I >wondered why its not there. > >The only reference I could find was this: >https://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg03604.html >it mentions that it "violates the spirit of how lisp functions evaluate >their arguments", but no more comment is made. > >I hope I'm forgiven if a flame war starts, but I'm trying to understand >what makes a good lisp. > >So, why is there no setf in picolisp?
-- SuperSaiyan Blue Sent via email ;)
