> >"misc/setf.l" is just a joke ;-)
> Unfortunately I still don't understand that joke. :-(
> There must be some reason why it's there ...
Not really. I'm a strong opponent of the CL 'setf' function. I think it
completely violates the spirit of how Lisp functions evaluate their
arguments. But I don't want to start a flame war here ...
It makes no sense to use this 'setf' in PicoLisp. Better use plain 'set'
on 'var' arguments.