>> a. A primary thin wrapper around setsockopt().
 >> b. Some secondary convenience functions for people unfamiliar with
 >>    setsockopt(2) only for those options which are commonly used.
 >
 >aka "both"? Sure! Doesn't bother me! :)

I like the convenience functions because then you don't have to bother
about to see if the constants or functions are there. I'd like to
think think they should always be there, even if the functionality
isn't there on this system.

Reply via email to