On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <s...@cuci.nl> wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: >>On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Mirar @ Pike developers forum >><10...@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: >>> Wait, I said REUSEPORT? What's the difference to REUSEADDR? Mysteries >>> of TCP sockets... > >>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14388706/socket-options-so-reuseaddr-and-so-reuseport-how-do-they-differ-do-they-mean-t > > Well, to be honest, I've only ever used and use REUSEADDR. > I'd say reuseaddr is more useful than reuseport, because the difference > will not be understood by the casual user, and reuseaddr has the > DWIM advantage here.
Separately to the REUSE* questions, I've been experimenting today with the IP_TOS settings, and to that end, dusted off this branch. Changes today: 1) Rebased rosuav/sockopt onto the current 8.1, so it's now current again 2) Changed setsockopt() to take three parameters so the level can be specified 3) Added a bunch more constants, including some from a new header file. The change is taking effect - I can see it in my outgoing logs - although whether it actually improves performance or not is another question. Example usage: https://github.com/Rosuav/Gypsum/commit/945b88 ChrisA
