Mirar @ Pike developers forum wrote: > >> a. A primary thin wrapper around setsockopt(). > >> b. Some secondary convenience functions for people unfamiliar with > >> setsockopt(2) only for those options which are commonly used.
> >aka "both"? Sure! Doesn't bother me! :) >I like the convenience functions because then you don't have to bother >about to see if the constants or functions are there. I'd like to >think think they should always be there, even if the functionality >isn't there on this system. Well, ok, but then provide a list of functions you'd expect to be there. IMO, not all of them are useful to have access to via convenience functions. -- Stephen.
