> 21 apr. 2016 kl. 18:33 skrev Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Pontus Östlund <pon...@roxen.com> wrote: >> The big problem with user contributions in docs is that the quality >> varies from "good enough to turn appalling docs into something you can >> actually use" to "flat-out wrong and horrendously misleading". Is >> someone going to vet all posts and make sure they're on the better >> side of the scale? >> >> >> Well, to be honest: Do we expect to drown in user contributed comments? > > Probably not (although pure bot-created spam will be an issue too). > It's not like Pike attracts large numbers of bad programmers. But > it'll still be worth having some form of moderation, even if it's > simply making it clear to people that comments can be removed. > > (Also: Comments should be text-only. No HTML, not even Markdown or > anything. That'll discourage the linkbots.)
We’ll the way I’m implementing it is you’ll have to authenticate via some of the larger web networks like Github, Twitter, Google, Instagram e t c. That would take care of bot created spam. My take on stuff like this is: Lets do it and if it becomes a problem, well lets deal with it then. It’s no harder than removing the functionality if it becomes a problem. # Pontus
