Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: >I mean the fact that you have to have a ; after } where } define a >function in functions (well, that's not really why, but it's where it >shows up).
Just committed a "fix" for that. My yacc-fu powers have dwindled a bit though... So if someone would like to check if the proposed solution is: a. sufficient? b. efficient? I'd be much obliged. -- Stephen.
