Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >>I mean the fact that you have to have a ; after } where } define a >>function in functions (well, that's not really why, but it's where it >>shows up).
>Just committed a "fix" for that. I see that Grubba committed a different fix instead. Maybe you already considered it: but lambda definitions of course are and remain expressions. I hope that this fix doesn't mess that up. -- Stephen.
