Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >>>I mean the fact that you have to have a ; after } where } define a >>>function in functions (well, that's not really why, but it's where it >>>shows up).
>>Just committed a "fix" for that. >I see that Grubba committed a different fix instead. >Maybe you already considered it: but lambda definitions of course >are and remain expressions. I hope that this fix doesn't mess that up. I see that the final fix is in. And I'm pleased to see that at least my original fix wasn't completely off the mark. Well, I guess, this one was/is for you Per, Rest In Peace. P.S. is the pike-devel gateway still working in both directions? I get the distinct impression that it's just one-way again. -- Stephen.
