Okay, it seems the problems are on my side. I will try with the latest build first and let you know if they still persist.
Frank Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 22:44 +0100 schrieb Janos SUTO: > On 2013-03-21 22:12, Frank Ellebrecht wrote: > >> > >> I can't reproduce it on the demo site. When I click on the search > >> button, > >> it returns every kind of actions. Is it from the latest build? > > almost > > > Well, I can't reproduce it either. On the demo site > > (<http://demo.mailpiler.org>) there is no audit log for the > > admin@local > > user. I tried <http://piler.aaa.fu.acts.hu> and there it seems to work > > (but it looks quite different, so I'm not really sure). > > this is the latest build, even though I use the future gui, another > user > is developing. When he's ready, then it will be the default. > > > In the meantime I noticed that the search result depends on the > > language > > settings. If you have chosen another language then English (or your > > browser default points to a non-English language) then both ways will > > return the same result. If you have chosen English, then the results > > will be different like I said. > > can you show me an example? > > > I use build 776 from March, 19th (on Bitbucket it's f530f84). As most > > of > > the later changes are done to make me happy, I can't imagine that they > > changed the search. But I will start to try with the latest version in > > a > > minute. > > the search results depend on exclusively on the query. The query > depends on > what you enter in the search box, the language settings shouldn't > affect it. > > One small affect of the search query is changed: a max. hit option is > appended > enabling to display >1000 search hits. But it's a language independent > feature. > > > > >>> I also noticed that tagging and annotating a message doesn't > >>> generate > >>> an event in the audit log. > >> > >> do you think it's worth to generate an entry? > >> > > I really don't know. It's my first encounter with mail archiving > > solutions, so I don't have any experience with other products. Maybe > > someone with more experience could help us here? But if even a search > > yields an entry, I thought it worth mentioning. > > it is :-) but my point is that you as an administrator will you every > search > for an action that a user tagged a message? Is it a meaningful / > important > action that must be remembered? > > > > >>> The page count calculation seems to be wrong (see my message some > >>> days > >>> ago). There are more entries shown per page than piler calculates > >>> for > >>> the number of result pages. That leads to empty pages at the end of > >>> the > >>> search results. > >> > >> can you reproduce it on the demo site? > >> > > If you'll give me an audit log, I'll test it, I promise! ;-) > > it's just hidden, see > http://demo.mailpiler.org/index.php?route=audit/audit > and you can use it. > > > An idea: on the super stylish version at acts.hu you calculate with 50 > > entries per page, in my version with 20 entries per page. Maybe you > > display already 50 entries, but still count the pages with 20 entries? > > There are definitely more than 20 entries displayed per page. > > I don't think so. The page calculation uses your current page length. > I couldn't produce on the demo site, neither on the super fancy > piler.aaa.... > site. > > > > > >>> And finally I somehow managed to generate an entry in the audit log > >>> with an action »??« and the description »unknown id: undefined«. I > >>> have > >>> no idea what I did. Any idea how to find it out? > >> > >> it usually happens when you refer to a non existing message, > >> attachment, ... > > I'll see if I find anything in the log file. > > ok > > Janos
