Hi Janos, Thanks for the response, in trying to do this (I cloned the repo, ./configure --localstatedir=/var --with-database=mariadb , and ran make) and got this:
Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/piler/src/piler/src' gcc -std=c99 -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wuninitialized -Wno-format-truncation -g -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/mariadb -I/usr/include/mariadb/mysql -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_TRE -DNEED_MYSQL -o pilerexport pilerexport.c -lpiler -lz -lm -ldl -lcrypto -lssl -ltre -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lmariadb -L. /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccU39C8h.o: in function `write_to_zip_file': /tmp/piler/src/piler/src/pilerexport.c:329: undefined reference to `zip_open' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/piler/src/piler/src/pilerexport.c:335: undefined reference to `zip_source_file' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/piler/src/piler/src/pilerexport.c:336: undefined reference to `zip_file_add' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/piler/src/piler/src/pilerexport.c:342: undefined reference to `zip_close' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/piler/src/piler/src/pilerexport.c:339: undefined reference to `zip_strerror' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [Makefile:63: pilerexport] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/piler/src/piler/src' make: *** [Makefile:41: all-recursive] Error 1 (Note that I originally got a zip.h not found error, which I ran apt install libzip-dev. Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS I can't seem to get past this point to recompile. On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:50 PM <s...@acts.hu> wrote: > > Hello Ryan, > > please apply this patch to pilerexport.c, and recompile it. > > https://bitbucket.org/jsuto/piler/commits/e6607b0bf1d44562bcf2a08e3bfed94181b7b95d > > It syslogs the sphinx query. Then try the following. Enter the search > query > on the gui, and record the sphinx query syslogged. Then re-run the > pilerexport command, and record the new sphinx query, and compare it > with the previous value. > > Verify that even the single-quotes and double quotes are the same in > both queries. > > Janos SUTO > > > On 2021-04-07 18:18, Ryan Blenis wrote: > > Hi Janos, > > > > I have to export potentially a ton of emails and was looking to use > > pilerexport versus multiple batches of GUI searches. I saw the -w flag > > and thought "great, I can use this" but it doesn't seem to respond > > appropriately for my test case. I have 2 emails that match the > > following (generalized terms used vs actual), limiting with -m 3 for > > testing purposes (I should only get 2 back). > > > > pilerexport -a 2010.10.01 -b 2021.04.06 -r "j...@domain.com" -m 3 -w > > 'MATCH('"'"'searchterm NEAR/25 (MNF|(search term)|term|(test search > > term)|termin*)'"'"')' > > > > Now, that match is just the bash string escaped version of: > > MATCH('searchterm NEAR/25 (MNF|(search term)|term|(test search > > term)|termin*)') > > (That's just a fancy sphinx query for "searchterm" within 25 words of > > MNF OR "search term" OR "term" OR "test search term" or "termin*" for > > those unfamiliar with sphinx.) > > > > Which, when overloading the Advanced Search for the "body" field in > > the GUI with: > > searchterm NEAR/25 (MNF|(search term)|term|(test search term)|termin*) > > > > Seems to work just fine and as expected, however, in pilerexport with > > the aforementioned command I get tons of unrelated emails (not even > > scoped to the appropriate j...@domain.com recipient). Is using a MATCH > > term like this with -w possible, or am I looking to do too much here? > > > > Note that I saw you added the -o parameter in the source so I may be a > > version or 2 back (utility doesn't seem to have a -v or --version > > output), and my version doesn't appear to have that, so I don't really > > have any great diagnostic/output information to go off of other than > > the above description. > > > > Thank you in advance as always for any insight you can give! >
