On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:34, Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Edward Hervey wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:10 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: >>> >>> * Whoever leaves a comment claiming the bug gets a lock for 48 hours. >>> If they submit a patch, the PiTiVi community must review it within 24 >>> hours, and if it works, should commit it! And then we say thanks and >>> we (and you guys) write a follow-up blog post welcoming the new >>> contributor into PiTiVi. >> >> 48 hours can be really short for solving some bugs, Jeff summed up >> most of the issue about that in his mail. >> Putting that time limit in your system makes sense, but I wouldn't >> stop it having multiple proposals if we take a bit more time reviewing >> the patches. > > You're right. > > Hey, so -- > > What bug are we going to use? And then once we figure that out, what should > we set the lock duration to? >
Is Bug 615570 still a good option? That is, to create a startup window for PiTiVi. If so, who would like to help me figure out how to solve the bug and document it for a newbie to try? [= -- .danny ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Pitivi-pitivi mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
