On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:34, Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Edward Hervey wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:10 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
* Whoever leaves a comment claiming the bug gets a lock for 48 hours.
If they submit a patch, the PiTiVi community must review it within 24
hours, and if it works, should commit it! And then we say thanks and
we (and you guys) write a follow-up blog post welcoming the new
contributor into PiTiVi.
48 hours can be really short for solving some bugs, Jeff summed up
most of the issue about that in his mail.
Putting that time limit in your system makes sense, but I wouldn't
stop it having multiple proposals if we take a bit more time reviewing
the patches.
You're right.
Hey, so --
What bug are we going to use? And then once we figure that out, what should
we set the lock duration to?
Is Bug 615570 still a good option? That is, to create a startup window
for PiTiVi. If so, who would like to help me figure out how to solve
the bug and document it for a newbie to try? [=
Maybe you I can give it a shot, writing a first draft, and we can send
that to the PiTiVi IRC channel for review? (I want to minimize the impact
on the PiTiVi team.)
-- Asheesh.
--
By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity. Another man's, I mean.
-- Mark Twain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Pitivi-pitivi mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pitivi-pitivi
