I think the reverse might actually be true. Calling it 1.0 implies that it will be compatible with Pivot 1.0, which it is not.
Maybe it would be better to align the version number with the JFreeChart version, and simply document the Pivot 1.1 dependency. On Thursday, April 02, 2009, at 04:43AM, "Christopher Brind" <[email protected]> wrote: >I thought of that initially, but no ... the version of this jar can be >independent of the version of Pivot. That is, it is version 1.0 of an >implementation of chart support using JFreeChart. > >Otherwise it implies that this jar will be incompatible with future versions >of Pivot, which it might not be, and also means that a new version of this >jar has to be created for each future version of Pivot, which is probably >unnecessary. As long as we reference the correct version, that's what >matters, IMHO. > >Cheers, >Chris > > >2009/4/2 Sandro Martini <[email protected]> > >> Hi to all, >> >> > Since the JFreeChart implementation is separate to the main release, I >> think >> > it should have a version number in its name. e.g. >> > http://pivot.googlecode.com/files/pivot-charts.jfree_1.0.jar >> Ok, but what do you think on using the same version number of the >> related pivot version (in this case pivot-charts.jfree-1.1.jar), to >> avoid confusion ? >> >> Bye, >> Sandro >> >
