This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said: > Hi all, > > Does anybody have the one and only idea on how to commence with the > gmp-licensing issue? Should we try to backport upstream's patch as is (that > is, > with the included source) and try to hammer it into lenny, or should we hope > for > the release team to allow this RC bug to stay in there for the release and > prepare a patched version for lenny r1, or should we fully ignore it for lenny > and wait for 0.95 to be released?
I'm keeping my head down and hoping it gets a lenny-ignore, frankly. It's come a bit late in the release cycle to try to do anything disruptive. > If there is a preference for the backport-version, I'd offer to try to do it > over the weekend, but then again we need to think about going for a version > that > links against an external libTomMath. I'm hoping to start going through upstream svn and provide a patch to get it to link against a system libtommath (I'm aiming to do something like the common --use-system-libtool switch lots of configures have, if possible). Help (especially testing) would be appreciated - it's been a little while since I did any serious autoconf hacking, and it's easy to get half right, so it works fine on my machine and completely breaks on the HPUX 2.3 running on someone's toaster. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [email protected] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
