> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:36:01 +0100 Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Does anybody have the one and only idea on how to commence with the > >gmp-licensing issue? Should we try to backport upstream's patch as is > (that is, > >with the included source) and try to hammer it into lenny, or should we > hope for > >the release team to allow this RC bug to stay in there for the release and > >prepare a patched version for lenny r1, or should we fully ignore it for > lenny > >and wait for 0.95 to be released? > > > >If there is a preference for the backport-version, I'd offer to try to do > it > >over the weekend, but then again we need to think about going for a > version that > >links against an external libTomMath. > > > > 0.95 is a month or two away and will break all the libclamav rdepends. I > wouldn't wait. >
But changing to libtommath could break quite a bit as well, so I'm really not that much a fan of doing this for lenny. Well, we'll see whether the release team forces us to do it or not. Best, Michael
pgpVPmcjWjJBs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
