> This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said: > > Hi all, > > > > Does anybody have the one and only idea on how to commence with the > > gmp-licensing issue? Should we try to backport upstream's patch as is (that > > is, > > with the included source) and try to hammer it into lenny, or should we > > hope for > > the release team to allow this RC bug to stay in there for the release and > > prepare a patched version for lenny r1, or should we fully ignore it for > > lenny > > and wait for 0.95 to be released? > > I'm keeping my head down and hoping it gets a lenny-ignore, frankly. > It's come a bit late in the release cycle to try to do anything > disruptive. >
Ok :-) > > If there is a preference for the backport-version, I'd offer to try to do it > > over the weekend, but then again we need to think about going for a version > > that > > links against an external libTomMath. > > I'm hoping to start going through upstream svn and provide a patch to > get it to link against a system libtommath (I'm aiming to do something > like the common --use-system-libtool switch lots of configures have, > if possible). Help (especially testing) would be appreciated - it's > been a little while since I did any serious autoconf hacking, and it's > easy to get half right, so it works fine on my machine and completely > breaks on the HPUX 2.3 running on someone's toaster. > I'd be happy to help out with the autoconf stuff, at least I've been doing that stuff quite frequently in recent times. Best, Michael
pgprwULBpXSPj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
