> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:49:32PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > That's a good question - I had assumed that they need some of the
> > RTLD_GLOBAL type stuff from the new version, but now that I look, it
> > doesn't look like anything that requires the new version (although I am
> > by far not a libtool/dlopen guru).  aCaB: do you know why it needs the
> > versioned dependency?
> 
> Hi,
> Just for clarity, the version requirement is something that comes from
> libtool itself. Once you start with one version it'll then self impose a
> version requirement and will simply refuse to downgrade.
> 
> The reason for picking 2.2.6 was that ltdl from prior versions is badly
> broken on OSX. Those bugs were fixed in 2.2.6.
> 

Ok, so we could in fact re-libtoolize it, but I doubt that this is worth the
trouble, libtool 2.2.6 will hopefully get uploaded to unstable soon.

Best,
Michael

Attachment: pgpm3WFLztqXN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel

Reply via email to