> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:35:15 +0000 Stephen Gran <sg...@debian.org> wrote: > >Hey everyone, > > > >I just did some upgrade testing, and did some fixups for the various > >hiccups I found while testing various things. Since all of these are > >pretty clearly low hanging fruit that will hit people doing an upgrade > >or a fresh install, what do people think about another upload? > > > >I know that ideally we'd wait for the fixed templates for the milter, > >but I think it's probably better to have a clean upgrade path than to > >wait for better language at this point. > > > >We should also start thinking about volatile - I'll take a look at what > >can be cherry-picked onto that branch. > > I have a couple of inputs I'll try to get you in the morning. >
I'm all for another upload, but I'd like to discuss a few bits of last night's patches - I'm online on IRC, which is probably more suitable for quick Q&A. Volatile: yes, definitely, but I'd like to see the new packages mature a few days before doing a volatile upload. What about rdepends - aren't we going to break these? And while we are at it: Should I mail to debian-release to request binNMUs of our rdepends? Thanks, Michael
pgpYG9QEfbheV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
