On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:35:32 +0100 Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:35:15 +0000 Stephen Gran <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Hey everyone, >> > >> >I just did some upgrade testing, and did some fixups for the various >> >hiccups I found while testing various things. Since all of these are >> >pretty clearly low hanging fruit that will hit people doing an upgrade >> >or a fresh install, what do people think about another upload? >> > >> >I know that ideally we'd wait for the fixed templates for the milter, >> >but I think it's probably better to have a clean upgrade path than to >> >wait for better language at this point. >> > >> >We should also start thinking about volatile - I'll take a look at what >> >can be cherry-picked onto that branch. >> >> I have a couple of inputs I'll try to get you in the morning. >> > >I'm all for another upload, but I'd like to discuss a few bits of last night's >patches - I'm online on IRC, which is probably more suitable for quick Q&A. > >Volatile: yes, definitely, but I'd like to see the new packages mature a few >days before doing a volatile upload. What about rdepends - aren't we going to >break these? > >And while we are at it: Should I mail to debian-release to request binNMUs of >our rdepends? > It will break them. I think it's also important to mail the affected maintainers. There was a good summary of the changes that aCaB showed us (I'm away from my computer, so I don't have a link) that I think we should make sure they are aware of.
Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
