On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:26:34 +0100 Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:20:22 +0100 Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Hmm, bind9 doesn't even suggest apparmor (only conflicts/replaces some >> older >> >versions). Would it be fine if we omit that suggests, but include all the >> other >> >stuff? >> > >> >> I'm good with that. >> > >Patch applied. I guess we'll need another profile for clamav-milter in the >future, the current one only applies to clamd and clamav-freshclam.
Agreed. In Ubuntu clamav-milter is not in the archive component that has security support from Canonical, so it wasn't an initial priority. Additionally, it needs to be tested for some time by someone who actually uses it. Unfortunately, I don't know of anyone that does. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
