Hi,
On 02.05.2014 22:09, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 02, 2014 20:45:55 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 02.05.2014 19:57, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I suspect they would appreciate the patch since using the system LLVM (or
at least updating to a newer one) is definitely in their plans.
I hope so. LLVM 2.8 is really a bit outdated (from 2010).
I harassed people on #clamav and got this:
Thanks.
<lattera> I could be wrong... llvm's not my area of expertise
<lattera> I asked my coworker, Kevin, to take a look at that bugzilla ticket
<lattera> after quick glance, he says he likes the patch overall
That's encouraging, but I'm not entirely comfortable yet (from what I know the
patch looks good too). How about we upload this patch to experimental and
then we can see how it works out on multiple architectures? Once upstream
reviews/acks the patch and we see how it works then we can go to unstable.
An upload to experimental seems like a good idea.
But keep in mind that experimental defaults to LLVM 3.4, while unstable
still defaults to LLVM 3.3 (and wheezy to LLVM 3.0).
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
