On Friday, May 02, 2014 23:10:02 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi, > > On 02.05.2014 22:52, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, May 02, 2014 22:19:03 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> An upload to experimental seems like a good idea. > >> But keep in mind that experimental defaults to LLVM 3.4, while unstable > >> still defaults to LLVM 3.3 (and wheezy to LLVM 3.0). > > > > Build-deps will only get pulled from Experimental if they aren't satisfied > > from Unstable, so we can do it with 3.3 or 3.4 depending on what you > > want. > It's just that depending on llvm-dev (as I did) will result in 3.4 in > experimental and in 3.3 in unstable. > As this shouldn't matter, because it builds fine with both, I'm in favor > of leaving the generic dependency, i.e. upload to experimental and build > against 3.4 there and afterwards upload to unstable and build against 3.3. > > More or less related to this, I found on [1]: > W implicit-declaration others.c:301 > > This can be trivially fixed by including the correct header > (libxml/parser.h), see attached patch. > Now I'm unsure as to where to push this change? > To the unstable branch as 0009-*.patch, thus using the same number as > for the LLVM patch, or to the aca_llvm branch as 0010-*.patch? > I would tend to the latter and then both can be uploaded to experimental > together.
The latter is fine, we just need to remember to grab it for an unstable upload if we do it before the LLVM situation is finalized. Also, please file a bug and send the change upstream if you haven't. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
