On 2015-11-27 00:01:09 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Andreas,
> On 24.11.2015 23:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The most important change between 0.98.7+dfsg-4+b1 and 0.99~rc2+dfsg-1 is > that in the latter the bytecode tests are actually run, while they aren't > in the former. > > So it's even worse than you thought: 0.98.7+dfsg-4+b1 is also broken on > powerpc. > I verified that by building current unstable branch, where the check patch > is fixed, on powerpc. It also fails with these segfaults. hehe. goodie. > It seems to me that LLVM's MCJIT is totally broken on powerpc, i.e. it … > This works with the JIT engine from LLVM 3.5, but the MCJIT engine from > LLVM 3.5 also segfaults. > > I have no idea how to fix LLVM. > We could work around this problem by using LLVM 3.5 on powerpc, but that is > no long term solution. That MCJIT thingy, why wasn't it used on llvm-3.5? Is it something that needs to be used on llvm-3.6? Looking at llvm's testsuite, it ignores failures on everything but x86. What exactly do we lose if we disable llvm? > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
