On 2015-12-03 00:21:53 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > As 0.99 has been released meanwhile, the point is moot anyway. Didn't expect them to act that quick :)
> Renaming to libclamunrar7 seems fine. > (Though it would be great if clamav wouldn't need this libclamunrar hack, > and instead could use e.g. libarchive for rar support.) My memory was that libarchive did not support v3 but according to https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/151#issuecomment-91876723 the libarchive implementation support lzss which should be v3. So this looks like it is as good as the non-free code we have here. > > This is what I planned for the bug against release.d.o (once we settled > > on libclamunrar): > > > > Subject: transition: clamav > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: transition > > Severity: normal > > > > The upcoming version 0.99 of clamav will have a SONAME bump. Currently > > we have 0.99-rc2 in experimental which built everywhere (mips is > > Needs-Build at the time of writing). > > We would plan to upload the final 0.99 into unstable once upstream > > released it and we were allowed of doing so of course :) > > That needs to be adapted a bit, since 0.99 is actually released now. ;) :) > > The auto tracker is okay, all reverse dependencies are: > > - libclamunrar > > - c-icap-modules > > - dansguardian > > - havp > > - python-clamav > > > > All packages build tested in sid-chroot against libclamav7 from > > experimental. > > > > In the last c-icap-modules upload (which is part of testing and > > unstable) the maintainer forgot to include the .so library that was built > > against libclamav-dev and as such the package is listed as `unknown` in the > > tracker (which is correct, no libclamav6 dependency). The bug #806757 has > > been filled regarding this issue. > > > > libclamunrar needs a source upload because it is has a manual > > dependency on libclamav6. > > > > After the upload to unstable we would plan to upload it to s-p-u and > ^ > I'd inject 'has migrated to testing' here. k. > > > os-p-u so it can pop up in s/updates and os/update. This unfortunately > > triggers a transition stable and oldstable. > ^ > Here 'in' is missing. k. > > Actually, I'm not sure how transitions in stable/old-stable are handled, > but I think they need a separate bug report. > Anyway, mentioning this here shouldn't hurt. yup, we will see. > Otherwise this looks fine. I imported the 0.99 which almost identical to 0.99-rc2. Since you did all the heavy lifting it easy doing :) I merged unstable into experimetal with "git merge -s ours unstable" so once we do the upload we can simply merge the experimental branch into unstable without any conflicts. I will open the bug against release.d.o soon and prepeare the libunrar package likely tomorrow. > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
