Hi Sebastian, On 30.11.2015 21:19, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I cherry-picked the commit [0] which is the one that added the ppc bits > here. Rebuilt llvm. It is still crashing, but now differently, this is > the output of `clambc unit_tests/input/inflate.cbc --debug` : [...] > |LibClamAV debug: [Bytecode JIT]; emitted ELF32-ppc <in-memory object> of 764 > bytes
So at least it could compile the bytecode. > |LibClamAV debug: bytecode self test running > |LibClamAV debug: Bytecode 4294967295: executing in JIT mode > | > |Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > |cli_vm_execute_jit (bcs=bcs@entry=0xbfffdfe0, ctx=0x10000, > ctx@entry=0x10066470, func=0x10049020) at bytecode2llvm.cpp:2409 > |2409 if (ctx->bytecode_timeout) > |(gdb) bt > |#0 cli_vm_execute_jit (bcs=bcs@entry=0xbfffdfe0, ctx=0x10000, > ctx@entry=0x10066470, func=0x10049020) at bytecode2llvm.cpp:2409 > |#1 0x0fece0a8 in cli_bytecode_run (bcs=bcs@entry=0xbfffdfe0, > bc=bc@entry=0x100385d0, ctx=ctx@entry=0x10066470) at bytecode.c:1841 > |#2 0x0fecec90 in run_selfcheck (bcs=0xbfffdfe0) at bytecode.c:2451 > |#3 selfcheck (engine=<optimized out>, jit=1) at bytecode.c:2484 > |#4 0x0fecefe4 in cli_bytecode_prepare2 (engine=engine@entry=0x10049d58, > bcs=bcs@entry=0xbfffe300, dconfmask=dconfmask@entry=15) > | at bytecode.c:2675 > |#5 0x100016a8 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at > bcrun.c:360 > |(gdb) p ctx > |$1 = (cli_bc_ctx *) 0x10000 > |(gdb) p *ctx > |Cannot access memory at address 0x10000 > > *Now* there is a stack, before that there was just garbage… However, it looks like the produced bytecode isn't quite correct. Probably this needs more commits from LLVM 3.8, no idea which ones, though. > Okay. Unless someone objects, I will prepare the unstable & exp release and > upload tomorrow with ppc-llvm support. Agreed. > And then I would > - open an import bug against c-icap-modules regarding missing clamav support OK. > - rebuild rev-deps They should be still fine, I guess, but more testing shouldn't hurt. > - prepare a bug against against release.d.o regarding the transition and > post here first :) Isn't it a bit early for that, as 0.99 hasn't been released? Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
