Hello,

They are delivered by normal bits...
But you have to tell JDS/Xfce/KDE "Hey, you have there new icons. Use them!"
I think that JDS/Xfce when starting, it updates icons, so it's useless to have
boot smf profile ... You need update it without reboot / log out log in.

But maybe we can define some smf service, which can update icons
(on all installed window managers) on demand. (I guess or restart action).
Then IPS package which deliver new icons, can say after installing it to
restart such service which will do that job correctly. (when delivering image
- more packages - it can restart such service after installing all packages.

This has to be designed well or it will be nightmare.

Petr Sobotka



2007/12/11, Trevor Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Danek Duvall wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Petr Sobotka wrote:
> >
> >> In lot's of spec files at SFE there is post run part (script),
> >> which update gtk icons. (It has nearly every application,
> >> which delivers icons)
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >> Is it already covered, or it's waiting?
> >> I'm not sure if action for that should be defined, but it would help.
> >
> > An action is one possibility, but this would work well as (part of) an SMF
> > service that ran at boot to update the desktop database.  We could then
> > provide a more generic action that would refresh a particular service on
> > successful installation, deinstallation, or upgrade.  When dealing with a
> > non-live image, it would simply be run during boot, as it's not likely to
> > be required for boot-time services.
>
> But surely you would not want to limit installation of icons to only when the
> system is booted?
>
> My old SPARC box used to be booted only once every few months - the rest of
> the time I used suspend/resume, and I wouldn't want to wait that long to see
> new icons.
>
> An action seems like a possibility, but is it too specific? What I mean is:
> couldn't this lead to a proliferation of actions to do X, where X is some
> small thing. Maybe I'm overreacting, but I could see someone implementing a
> package for some aspect of KDE saying 'oh, we need an action to update menus'
> or somesuch.
>
> I guess what would be interesting to figure out is what is preventing the icon
> files being laid down by the normal packaging bits? Establish what the
> use-case is and then figure out what the best method is to implement that.
>
> Trev
>
>
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to