Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-22 18:46]: >> Open question for all involved: What do we need to do at a technical >> level to fold these source trees together? Are there any policies >> we need to agree upon? > > Trevor hinted at one concern, which is that we understand how to pull > them apart, if they end up living in separate consolidations. I think > it's safe to say that there will be configurations that don't wish to > have X11 installed, so we should keep the packages separate as well. > > Perhaps > > src > cmd > cli > ipsgui > lib > test > > is where we're headed, but it would be good to understand if distutils > imposes a conventional structure. > >> I don't even know where the source for the packagemanager is hosted? > > Looks like it's in the main JDS repository, under ipsgui/. > That is right, the project currently is under under svn control: svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/jds/ipsgui
I agree about the approach proposed by Stephen, that this should be separated, maybe just a little change in naming from ipsgui to gui or packagemanager. In my opinion the natural way would be through webrev as this is used for putting changes to the IPS. -- best Michal _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
