I'll give you an example: SUNWbash ships usr/ usr/bin/ usr/bin/bash but SUNWvtsts ships usr/sunvts/ usr/sunvts/lib/ and usr/sunvts/lib/conf/xnetbtest.conf but not usr/sunvts/lib/conf/ and not usr/
should it be considered policy violation? Alexander Vlasov wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed almost all (not tested all, though) packages provide > directories to to create full path to installed file. I.e. if package > brings /usr/some/strange/runme, it also bringa usr/, usr/some/ and > /usr/some/strange/ directories. Seems pkg handling this correct. > So I´m asking for clarification: > 1) is it necessary (read: should be included in packaging policy) to > bring all directories? If yes, I´m gonna implement automatic testing for > this > 2) how pkg actually handles this? Looking at non-empty dirs or into > other packages´ manifests? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
