Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Vlasov wrote:
>>
>> > It means all of them should deliver /usr for quite obvious reason: nobody
>> > knows which packages would be installed on particular machine. With
>> > 1,000,000 installation someone will definitely end up with /usr erased.
>> > And "some" is not an answer anyway: absolutely clear condition should
>> > exist. It should be either one package (and everybody should depend on it
>> > somehow, maybe implicitly) or all of them who have any objects under
>> /usr.
>>
>> I'd much rather have the former.
>>
>
> I tend to agree with Danek here. Rather than duplicate information
> about the /usr directory in thousands of packages, it makes sense that
> it would be defined by one base package that is guaranteed to be
> installed.
>
Excellent. Please name this package, check if all base directories are
really there and let's write this decision somewhere. It would be really
nice.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
